Navigating the Japanese property market
Focusing on the true drivers of Japan’s real estate market, as well as understanding its nuances and complexity, is imperative to investment success, according to Fidelity’s Guillermo de las Casas.
- The recent past is a testament to the unpredictability of Japan's property market, and while the soft economic policies of the nation's central bank have significantly influenced real estate stocks, investment success is not about riding a trend, it's about understanding the fundamental factors that drive markets, explains Fidelity Portfolio Manager Guillermo de las Casas.
- "Truth be told, in recent months I underestimated the ability of Japanese property stocks to generate cash flow, particularly as they benefited tremendously from moves by the Bank of Japan," says de las Casas, who manages Fidelity Advisor® International Real Estate Fund. "It's clear that relying too heavily on the economic perception of the country's Board of Governors is not a sustainable investment strategy."
- In helming the portfolio of primarily non-U.S. real estate stocks since 2010, de las Casas emphasizes companies he believes have not fully achieved their long-term growth potential. Given the cyclicality and short-term nature that typically characterizes international real estate investing, he targets firms that are less reliant on short-term factors and more driven by a secular-growth business model.
- Moreover, de las Casas believes the best strategy for repeatable, long-term success is to focus on companies with sustainable earnings growth that he considers underpriced. This principle, he notes, remains steadfast, even in the face of potential policy shifts by central banks.
- "Recently, I have learned to recognize and appreciate the value in solid, sustainable cash-flow yield," says de las Casas. "By 'solid,' I mean not based on either financial engineering and/or acquiring property that does not have a sustainable yield for at least one lease cycle, a feat that can be hard to discern without meticulous bottom-up research."
- The case for Japanese large-cap developers, in his view, is based on their ability to cultivate low-yielding office properties, either keeping them on the balance sheet or selling them to Japanese real estate investment trusts at an even lower yield.
- The first option poses significant risk, especially given interest-rate uncertainty in Japan, whereas the second option is virtually nonexistent, as Japanese REITs have sold off in favor of higher yields available in government bonds, de las Casas points out.
- He underscores that even if the monetary policy backdrop for Japan does not change, equity valuations for the nation's property developers appear significantly out of sync with their earnings, stemming from record-low interest expense at the core of these profits.
- "Although there have been some recent positive developments in the industry — including better corporate governance and the crystalizing of some cross-holdings — I remain skeptical about the potential for long-term sustainable cash-flow growth in these businesses," de las Casas contends.
- Furthermore, minimal barriers to entry, in addition to the considerable vulnerability of both office and mall assets to technological innovation, make these Japanese property stocks even less appealing, concludes de las Casas. Consequently, the fund is underweight Japan at the end of January.
Fidelity Advisor International Real Estate Fund (FIRIX)
Seeks capital appreciation.
Related insights
View all
For specific fund information such as standard performance and holdings, please go to the "Funds Managed" link on this page.
Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk. Nothing in this content should be considered to be legal or tax advice, and you are encouraged to consult your own lawyer, accountant, or other advisor before making any financial decision. These materials are provided for informational purposes only and should not be used or construed as a recommendation of any security, sector, or investment strategy.
Fidelity does not provide legal or tax advice and the information provided herein is general in nature and should not be considered legal or tax advice. Consult with an attorney or a tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.
Past performance and dividend rates are historical and do not guarantee future results.
Investing involves risk, including risk of loss.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.
Sector funds can be more volatile because of their narrow concentration in a specific industry. Growth stocks can perform differently from other types of stocks and the market as a whole and can be more volatile than other types of stocks. Value stocks can perform differently than other types of stocks and can continue to be undervalued by the market for long periods of time. • Stock markets, especially foreign markets, are volatile and can decline significantly in response to adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. • Foreign securities are subject to interest rate, currency exchange rate, economic, and political risks, all of which are magnified in emerging markets. • In general the bond market is volatile, and fixed income securities carry interest rate risk. (As interest rates rise, bond prices usually fall, and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities.) Fixed income securities also carry inflation, credit, and default risks for both issuers and counterparties. • Lower-quality bonds can be more volatile and have greater risk of default than higher-quality bonds. • The municipal market is volatile and can be significantly affected by adverse tax, legislative, or political changes, and the financial condition of the issuers of municipal securities. • The securities of smaller, less well-known companies can be more volatile than those of larger companies. • The funds can invest in securities that may have a leveraging effect (such as derivatives and forward-settling securities) that may increase market exposure, magnify investment risks, and cause losses to be realized more quickly. • Leverage can magnify the impact of adverse issuer, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments on a company. In the event of bankruptcy, a company’s creditors take precedence over the company’s stockholders. Although the companies that the fund invests in may be highly leveraged, the fund itself does not use leverage as an investment strategy. Changes in real estate values or economic downturns can have a significant negative effect on issuers in the real estate industry. In the event of bankruptcy, a company’s creditors take precedence over the company’s stockholders. Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.